|
Renting equipment remains a double-edged
sword
By Randy Bonnecaze
At some point, you're going to need a new truck, a better
computer system or more up-to-date equipment. Although the
decision to acquire one or more of these items is generally
easy to make, you may be tempted to defray some of the costs
by leasing an asset instead of buying it. This isn't necessarily
a bad idea, but it is one that calls for careful consideration.
It's less hassle. Leasing has many advantages. The main one
is gaining use of an asset for less money than you would need
to buy it. But there are others as well, including:
1. Easier credit terms. Finding someone who will lease equipment
to you is usually less troublesome than locating someone willing
to extend the credit needed to buy the item. Also, you may
be able to negotiate a longer period and more flexible payment
schedule with a lease than a loan.
2. Fewer financial restrictions. An equipment lease rarely
includes provisions limiting future financial operations.
Loans commonly come with restrictions on acquiring more equipment
or borrowing additional funds without the lender's permission.
3. Greater ability to shop around. If you are uncertain about
a piece of equipment's usefulness, leasing it on a short-term
basis allows you to evaluate the item without committing too
many resources. You can also use short-term leases to test
and compare different brands and models.
4. More convenient maintenance. Many lessors retain responsibility
for maintaining and repairing the equipment in question. Thus,
you can avoid finding qualified repair service providers and
decrease your downtime when repairs are necessary.
But downsides exist. The biggest disadvantage of a lease
is that an asset's cost, over its life, often exceeds the
purchase price. This is because rental payments must compensate
the lessor for acquisition and financing expenses, as well
as for its retained risk of continued ownership. Worse yet,
as lessee you lose the accelerated depreciation-related tax
deductions that come with ownership.
Also, leasing does not establish equity in the equipment.
At the end of the lease term, you have no tangible asset to
show for the expenditure. One solution to this is to negotiate
a purchase option, under which some of your lease payments
go toward the purchase price and create equity.
Last, once you sign a lease agreement, you commit to making
payments for the entire stated period. If you stop using the
asset, you may incur large fees.
Purchasing retains power. So is leasing really worth it?
There's an easy way to answer this question. With your financial
advisor's help, set up a projected cash flow statement showing
the benefits of the item in question and the respective costs
of both leasing and purchasing. Then perform a net present
value analysis of your cash flow under both options and compare
the results.
If you decide to buy instead of lease, keep a few things
in mind. Negotiate equipment purchases carefully - know what
you want and what you'll pay before you start shopping. In
addition, don't overlook the second-hand market for used equipment.
You may be able to buy the same asset for a fraction of the
cost.
Finally, as mentioned, remember the tax benefits of buying.
You can save the most by electing to expense a portion of
the item's cost in the year of acquisition per annual IRS
limitations and expense the remainder through annual depreciation
deductions. Consider financing the purchase as well - the
interest payments are deductible on your federal tax return.
Editor's Note: Randy J. Bonnecaze
is a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) with Hannis T. Bourgeois
LLP, Baton Rouge.
|